Belize News,

 Breaking News
  • Special Constable Detained After Questionable Kidnapping Jacinto Luna, 31, a Special Constable employed with the Belize City Council has made a Police report to the Belmopan Police that he had been kidnapped and the rented Toyota...
  • Search Intensifies for Missing Men The disappearance of two men from San Pedro Town since last week Thursday has created quite a stir among family members, friends and members of the Belize Police Department who...
  • Who Killed Marcia Talbert…And Why? Police, on Monday, confirmed to the media that slain security officer, Marcia Talbert, 40, had received threats recently at her job site at the Bowen and Bowen compound in Ladyville....
  • Auditor General’s Report Highlights Systemic Failure Thursday, June 20, 2019 The Auditor General’s preliminary annual report on the government’s 2014/2015 fiscal year, which was circulated in the media this week, highlights a number of glaring issues...

Bennett U.S Extradition Case ‘Stayed’- & Going To Supreme Court

Bennett U.S Extradition Case ‘Stayed’- & Going To Supreme Court
June 07
16:55 2019

Thursday, June 6, 2019 –
Attorney Andrew Bennett, who faces an extradition proceeding for his alleged role in a money laundering sting conducted by US authorities, was back in Court on Tuesday for what should have been the start of the hearing. Instead, his attorneys made a “case stayed” submission, essentially claiming Bennett’s constitutional rights were violated.

Bennett’s extradition case is taking place in the Magistrate’s Court. However, the case stayed submission will be heard by the Supreme Court. While the case stayed is being heard by the Supreme Court, the extradition hearing will be temporarily put on hold until the higher court reaches a determination on whether Bennett’s rights were violated.
Linked News Article

Bennett’s attorneys, Anthony Sylvestre and Iliana Swift contend that a missing document, which was not initially included in the extradition bundle of documents, should not be allowed by the Court at this point. In addition, the attorneys claim that US authorities illegally intercepted Bennett’s communications and are using those contents against him. The lawyers argue that there should have been Supreme Court approval under the Interception of Communications Act.

The prosecution, represented by the Director of Public Prosecutions Cheryl-Lynn Vidal and Assistant Solicitor General, Samantha Matute-Tucker, indicated that they will not object to the application and will fight the Supreme Court proceedings.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Related Articles

search bar

Sunbright Ad